In the Cut
USA, 2003. Rated R. 119 minutes.
Meg Ryan, Mark Ruffalo, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Kevin Bacon, Nick Damici,
Sharrieff Pugh, Sunrise Coigney, Susan Gardner, Heather Litteer
|Grade: C-||Review by Dominic Varle|
"[I]t was not knowledge but unity that she desired, not inscriptions on tablets, nothing that could be written in any language known to men, but intimacy itself, which is knowledge, she had thought..."
Lily Briscoe in To The Lighthouse, by Virginia Woolf
"The man who sets his expectations low will seldom be disappointed"
18th Century proverb
s there another director who disappoints as much as Jane Campion? It's been ten years since The Piano, her commercial and critical peak, and to say that In The Cut is Campion's best film since is to damn it with the faintest of praise. Adapted by Campion and Susanna Moore from the latter's 1996 best-selling novel, In The Cut wants to be a noirish thriller evocative of Alan J. Pakula's Klute (1971) in its setting, visual tone, and relationships between the principal characters. Its central theme is consistent with Campion's last few films: exploring inter-sexual dynamics in the shadow of desire, vulnerability, and the fight/flight response this can provoke. The theme and homage are just two of several things that are ostensibly in the film's favor. Why then, is it so poor? It's even more disappointing than Campion's last film, the inexorable Holy Smoke! (1999). No, really.
Holy Smoke!, which followed that cold fish of a movie, The Portrait of a Lady (1996), was a stinker. So many things about it didn't add up; Harvey Keitel in a dress and makeup was the least of it. For a time, one thing that perplexed me was Campion's choice of a poem by Philip Larkin, (Ignorance, "Strange to know nothing, never to be sure of what is true or right or real") as Holy Smoke!'s epigraph. For a director who is often acclaimed or decried "feminist"a weak label that stems more from the welcome absence of male perspective in her films than any favoritism of one sex over anotherCampion's use of Larkin seems improbable at first glance, particularly in light of his baser later poems. On closer inspection, though, Larkin's "frustration [with] love, and the difficulty of attaining satisfaction within it" (according to poet Peter Filkins) is thematically echoed in Campion's recent films.
If Campion is similarly frustrated, it's evident in her continuing her disdain for romance, love's conventional precursor. Campion, like co-writer Moore, has little time for mannered rituals of courtship. For her, "romance" seems to embody some kind of Panglossian smoke and mirrors, obscuring earthierand therefore more real?proclivities. So In The Cut, like Holy Smoke! before it, dispenses with romance altogether. In Smoke, Harvey Keitel's character says, "To open yourself to another person...is a profoundly difficult business." By placing (the overly-hyped) eroticism at the heart of In The Cut's central relationship, Campion and Moore bypass this "profoundly difficult business" entirely, which suggests at least one lesson was learned from Holy Smoke!
Meg Ryan and Jennifer Jason Leigh are half sisters in In the Cut
The obvious pick of Larkin's poetry for In The Cut would be This Be The Verse ("They fuck you up, your mum and dad"). Frannie (Meg Ryan) is a thrift store-dowdy, creative writing teacher on Manhattan's seedy Lower East Side, trying in vain to impress upon her pupils the merits of Virginia Woolf. Early on, a Bunuelian post-orgasm dream hints that her attitude about relationships is strongly influenced by her parents. (But then, whose isn't?) However, unlike her half-sister Pauline, she hopes to avoid the attention that their capricious father lavished upon her naďve mother. As a result, like Jane Fonda's Bree Daniels in Klute, she sees through a glass, darkly; what wisdom she finds in Woolf or poetry brings her scant comfort. The sexually brasher Pauline (Jennifer Jason Leigh) is faring little better, having obsessively fallen for a doctor who will never leave his wife, and who has placed her under a restraining order. Each sister wants love, but while one is not looking, the other is looking in all the wrong places.
To fill this void, Frannie has made language her love (if compiling a compendium of slang and reading subway poetry like a fortune cookie can be considered love). While researching her book in a bar, Frannie almost stumbles into a couple having sex in the dingy basement bathroom. Later, when the same woman turns up "disarticulated" in front of her apartment, reality soon supplants language in filling the void. Well, a kind of reality. Campion and Moore juxtapose Frannie's descent into this dingy netherworld with her pondering Dante's allegory of mid-life crisis on a subway poster. They go on to fuse her prosaic and poetic concerns with a heavy-handed mix of fairy-tale (say hello, Alice in Wonderland, Little Red Riding Hood) and clumsy visual symbolism (persisting almost to distraction with a primary red motif in virtually every scene). When, shortly thereafter, Detective Malloy (Mark Ruffalo) appears on Frannie's staircase like the White Rabbit, I remembered what the dormouse said ("Feed your head. Feed your head. Feed your head") and began to wish I was elsewhere, feeding my head with something more nourishing than this increasingly over-cooked stew of allegory and metaphor.
Clumsier elements notwithstanding, In The Cut is brilliantly photographed by Dion Beebe (Chicago). From the opening scene, colors hit yougolds and russets and greensbathing you as Beebe pans with a shallow focus in a way that suggests an Impressionist eye at work. It's the most striking element of the film, as if taking a cue from Camus' "Autumn is a second spring when every leaf is a flower." It's a lovely ironythat in a film where words and poetry are passions of its main characterit's the cinematography that is most poetic. The visual metaphors may quickly tire, but Beebe's photography transcends the visual; it's sensual.
On the subject of which, what of Meg "America's Sweetheart" Ryan, and her "brave new direction"? Well, she holds her own among the actors around her (Ruffalo, Jason Leigh, and Kevin Bacon as her stalker/neighbor are superb), but the résumé that trails in her wake undermines her effectiveness as Frannie. Ryan is "America's Sweetheart" precisely because she (or the roles she playsyou decide) is sexless. To a large extent this works with "drab" Frannie, but it's impossible to get beyond The Meg Ryan Factor during her "erotic" interludes. Meg Ryan masturbating! Meg Ryan having phone sex! Meg Ryan having sex with the phone!
By the time Frannie handcuffs Malloy to the radiator and cathartically shags him to within an inch of her life, I was ready to scream, "Enough! I get it already!" That Frannie has an Oedipal character arc, like a modern-day Lily Briscoe, is refreshing to see, but only up to a point. So pervasive is the artless symbolism with which Campion persists to the very end of this film, that any point she may havealong with the storybecomes obscured by the very means she employs to express it. Neil Jordan's 1984 film of Angela Carter's The Company of Wolvesto which this film owes as much of a debt as it likes to think it does to Klutewas a stroll in the park compared to the metaphorical and allegorical overload foisted on the audience by In The Cut.
There's a danger that one can read far more into a film than is actually there, maybe trying too hard to find meaning where there is little or none to be found. But it's not the subtext that is the ultimate weakness of this film, it's the storytelling. Frannie's arc feels too literal, as though there's too much closure for her. It makes In The Cut more disappointing than if it had been directed by someone from whom I expect less than I do from Jane Campion.
© October 2003 by AboutFilm.Com and the author.
Images © 2003 Screen Gems. All Rights Reserved.
|Comment on this review on the boards|
|Rotten Tomatoes page|